Amazon just dropped Aurora DSQL, and if you're like us, the first question is: What exactly is this, and where does it fit? Aurora DSQL is AWS's shiny new distributed SQL database, claiming to bring PostgreSQL compatibility into a serverless, highly scalable environment. Sounds great, right? But let’s dig in—this database has some strengths and a few quirks that you’ll want to know before you dive in.
Aurora DSQL is Amazon’s innovative take on combining the familiarity of relational databases with the scalability and flexibility of serverless distributed systems. It’s designed to deliver the power of PostgreSQL while shedding the traditional infrastructure management overhead. In short, it’s a database built for modern, cloud-native applications that need to handle unpredictable workloads with ease.
Here’s the high-level pitch:
Aurora DSQL is Amazon’s answer for teams who want relational database capabilities in a serverless package, making it an attractive option for elastic, high-concurrency workloads. But as with any innovation, it comes with its own set of trade-offs, which we’ll explore further.
Let’s be real—Aurora DSQL isn’t perfect - like every product. There are some limitations and “gotchas” you need to know before jumping in.
Missing PostgreSQL Features:
Aurora DSQL might claim PostgreSQL compatibility, but let's be honest—it’s more like Postgre-Wire Protocol Compatible. Why? While it supports the syntax and APIs for basic SQL operations, many of PostgreSQL's powerful features are notably absent. Here's the rundown:
Calling Aurora DSQL "PostgreSQL-compatible" feels a bit generous. There’s a more accurate description for that: “PostgreSQL wire-protocol compatible.” It can speak PostgreSQL, but it doesn't deliver the full experience of a traditional PostgreSQL database. If your app relies heavily on PostgreSQL’s advanced features, you’ll need to refactor—or rethink entirely.
Optimistic Concurrency Control:
Aurora DSQL uses optimistic concurrency control to manage simultaneous updates to the same data. Instead of locking rows, it detects conflicts when they happen. If two processes try to update the same data at the same time, one will succeed while the other gets an error and needs to retry. This design removes the risk of deadlocks entirely, but it does mean your application needs to handle these errors and implement retry logic.
Transaction Row Limit:
Aurora DSQL enforces a liste. If your app relies on bulk operations, like 10.000, you’ll need to rethink how you structure those tasks. Deleting 10,000 rows? You’ll have to break it into smaller chunks and commit them.
Where Aurora DSQL Fits (and Where It Doesn’t)
Aurora DSQL shines in scenarios where scalability, elasticity, and integration with AWS services are key. It’s a strong contender for:
There are also clear situations where Aurora DSQL isn’t the best fit:
When evaluating Aurora DSQL, it’s important to see how it compares to other modern database solutions regarding features, scalability, and best-fit use cases. To help you make an informed decision, here’s a quick comparison of Aurora DSQL alongside Google Cloud AlloyDB, batch ,and AuroraDB Serverless.
Feature |
AWS Aurora DSQL |
Google Cloud AlloyDB |
DynamoDB |
AuroraDB Serverless |
Data Model |
Relational (PostgreSQL-compatible) |
Relational ( PostgreSQL-comptabile= |
NoSQL (Key-Value/Document) |
Relational (PostgreSQL/MySQL) |
Scaling |
Serverless, distributed SQL |
Managed Global SQL scaling |
Serverless, globally scalable |
Serverless, vertical scaling |
Transaction Model |
ACID (10,000-row limit) |
Strong global ACID |
Limited ACID (25-item limit) |
ACID |
PostgreSQL Compatibility |
Partial |
Full |
None |
Full |
Extensions |
Partial |
Full |
None |
Full |
No Connection Pooling Required |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
AZ Fault Tolerance |
High (distributed nodes) |
High (replicated globally) |
High |
Medium (multi-AZ replication) |
Best Fit |
OLTP + OLAP |
Complex, distributed OLTP |
NoSQL Workloads |
General Relational Workloads |
Geospatial Support |
No |
Yes |
No |
Yes (via PostGIS for PostgreSQL) |
Authentication |
IAM-Only |
Google IAM |
IAM-Like |
IAM, native user credentials |
Aurora DSQL represents AWS’s vision for a distributed, serverless SQL database that blends scalability with simplicity. By combining PostgreSQL compatibility with serverless architecture, it offers an efficient solution for teams looking to focus on development rather than the operational complexities of managing infrastructure.
However, Aurora DSQL is not a drop-in replacement for PostgreSQL. While it supports the PostgreSQL wire protocol and basic SQL operations, it lacks advanced features like triggers, views, extensions, and certain data types such as JSONB. These omissions mean it’s better suited for new, cloud-native projects designed with its strengths and limitations in mind, rather than migrating feature-rich PostgreSQL applications.
Instead of thinking of Aurora DSQL as “PostgreSQL in the cloud,” consider it for its serverless, multipurpose capabilities. It’s an OLTP database that can also handle OLAP workloads, making it a strong alternative to DynamoDB for teams that need more powerful querying capabilities but don’t have predefined query patterns. Aurora DSQL feels like Postgres but drives like serverless—and we like that.
The serverless design remains its biggest advantage, offering dynamic scaling and cost efficiency. However, the quirks require careful consideration during the design phase.
We specialize in helping organizations navigate the complexities of modern databases. Whether you’re exploring Aurora DSQL for a new project or rethinking your database strategy, we’re here to provide practical insights and solutions tailored to your needs.
Get in touch with us to learn how we can help you unlock the potential of Aurora DSQL and AWS’s database offerings.